山东国家级气象观测站综合判识观测项目评估分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李芸,女,高级工程师,主要从事气象数据质控分析与研究等工作,2806738524@qq.com。李长军,男,正高级工程师,主要从事气象数据质控分析与研究等工作,759024710@qq.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

山东省气象局科研项目(2018sdqxm19)


请扫码阅读

Assessment analysis of comprehensive judgement items in records of national meteorological observation stations in Shandong
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于全国综合气象信息共享系统(CIMISS)数据库,以一致率(冻土深度用误差绝对值)作为检验指标。对山东国家级气象观测站15项自动综合判识数据,与同期台站观测结果做对比检验,并进行评估分析。结果表明:1)总云量判识一致率为65.8%,云量偏差绝对值为1的占比51.1%;大部分不一致的情况出现在实况为阴天到满云时,判识结果为无云或少云。云高分类后与人工观测的总体一致率为85.0%。各站云高一致率均高于云量。2)雾凇、雨凇、雾、轻雾、浮尘、扬沙、沙尘暴、积雪和结冰等9种现象综合判识结果与台站观测一致率达92.0%以上;霜、霾、露的一致率为75.0%以上。结冰、轻雾、雾与霜命中率较高;积雪、雨凇与扬沙漏判率较高;沙尘暴、雨凇、扬沙和雾凇空判率较高。3)雨凇、雾凇判识效果受单站样本大小的影响;评估期内国家级气象观测站无草温观测任务,是造成积雪现象漏判率高的主要原因。有降水天气现象时,同时出现的视程障碍类天气现象不判识,是其漏判率增大的原因之一。4)评估时段冻土数据绝对误差平均值为1.6 cm,判识与实测误差绝对值在1~10 cm之间的占82.8%,判识效果较好。通过评估分析可见,基于卫星、探空、自动气象站、雷达、闪电定位等多源数据,结合模式再分析产品,实现综合判识结果与台站观测数据一致性较好,能够更好地满足气象预报服务需求。

    Abstract:

    Based on the CIMISS (China Integrated Meteorological Information Service System) database and using consistency ratio (in depth test of frozen soil using absolute value of error) as the inspection index, the data of 15 automatic comprehensive judgement items in records of national meteorological stations in Shandong are compared with the synchronous observation results of the stations, and assessment analysis is carried out. The results are shown below. 1) The consistency ratio of the judgement of total cloud cover is 65.8% and the absolute value of cloud cover deviation being 1 accounts for 51.1%. Most of the inconsistency occurs when the observation is between overcast sky and full clouds but the judgement results are cloudless or partly cloudy. The overall consistency ratio of cloud height after classification is 85.0% compared with observations. The consistency ratio of cloud height is higher than that of cloud cover at each station. 2) The consistency ratio is above 92.0% between observations and comprehensive judgement results of 9 weather phenomena, including rime, glaze, fog, mist, suspended dust, blowing sand, sand and dust storm, snow cover, and icing; the consistency ratio of frost, haze, and dew is above 75.0%. The hit rate of judging icing, mist, fog, and frost is high; the omission rate of judging snow cover, glaze, and blowing sand is high; the vacancy rate of judging sand and dust storm, glaze, blowing sand, and rime is high. 3) The judgement effect of glaze and rime is affected by the sample size of a single station; there is no observation task of grass temperature for the national meteorological observation stations during the assessment period, which is the main reason for the high omission rate of judging snow cover. When there is precipitation, the concurrent phenomena of visual range obstruction cannot be judged, and this explains the high omission rate. 4) The average absolute error of frozen soil data during the assessment period is 1.6 cm, the absolute value of error between judgement and observation from 1 cm to 10 cm accounts for 82.8%, and the judgement performs well. Through the assessment analysis, it can be seen the consistency is higher between comprehensive judgement results and observations based on multi-source data of satellite, sounding, automatic meteorological station, radar, and lightning location system combined with reanalysis products of models, which can better meet the needs of weather forecast.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李芸,李长军,周笑天,崔雅琴,张平.山东国家级气象观测站综合判识观测项目评估分析[J].海洋气象学报,2021,41(1):138-146.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
文章历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-04-14
  • 出版日期: 2021-02-28

“中法海洋卫星”专刊征稿

关闭