CFOSAT与MetOp卫星散射计12.5km产品反演风速交叉验证分析
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东省气象防灾减灾重点试验室,山东 济南 250031 ;2.山东省气候中心,山东 济南 250031 ;3.长岛国家气候观象台,山东 长岛 265800 ;4.国家气候中心,北京 100081

作者简介:

高理,女,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事海洋气象和气候应用研究,gaoli201213@163.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P405

基金项目:

风云卫星应用先行计划项目(FY-APP-ZX-2023.02);环渤海区域科技协同创新基金项目(QYXM202107,QYXM202206);山东省气象局科研项目(2023SDYD07)


请扫码阅读

Cross-validation analysis of wind speed retrieved by 12.5 km products of CFOSAT and MetOp satellite scatterometers
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Key Laboratory for Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Shandong, Jinan 250031 , China ; 2.Shandong Climate Center, Jinan 250031 , China ; 3.Changdao National Climate Observatory, Changdao 265800 , China ; 4.National Climate Center, Beijing 100081 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    按照30 min和50 km的时空窗口,对2021—2022年同期在轨的中法海洋卫星(China-France Oceanography SATellite,CFOSAT)微波散射计(SCATterometer,简记为“CSCAT”)与MetOp(Meteorological Operational)卫星A、B、C星先进散射计(Advanced SCATterometer-A/B/C,ASCAT-A/B/C)反演海面风速进行交叉配对,进而对匹配数据进行降雨和陆地质控、匹配数据相关分析、相对误差和风速分布偏差分析,结果如下:(1)质量控制后CSCAT与ASCAT-A反演风速相关系数为0.94~0.97,均方根误差为0.82~1.89 m·s-1。(2)2 m·s-1以下风速段CSCAT比ASCAT-A/B/C大30%~70%,2~21 m·s-1风速段CSCAT比ASCAT-A小0~5%,2~3 m·s-1风速段CSCAT较ASCAT-B/C大3%~30%,4~17 m·s-1风速段CSCAT比ASCAT-B/C小2%~10%。(3)2021年中国近海整体风速CSCAT大于ASCAT-A,其中1月,东海、南海、菲律宾及以东海域CSCAT比ASCAT-A大0.5~1.5 m·s-1;7月,黄海、南海CSCAT比ASCAT-A大1.0~1.5 m·s-1,与中国近海2021年各月平均风速变化相吻合,表明卫星间风速交叉验证可以很好地揭示卫星间风速的差异。

    Abstract:

    The cross matching of sea surface wind speed retrieved by China-France Oceanography SATellite (CFOSAT) SCATterometer (hereinafter referred to as “CSCAT”) and Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT) onboard MetOp (Meteorological Operational)-A/B/C satellites (hereinafter referred to as “ASCAT-A/B/C”) in the same period of 2021-2022 is carried out according to the space-time windows of 30 min and 50 km, and then after rainfall and land quality control, the matched data is studied with respect to correlation, relative error and deviation analysis of wind speed distribution. The results are listed as follows. (1) After quality control, the correlation coefficient between CSCAT and ASCAT-A is 0.94-0.97, and the root mean square error is 0.82-1.89 m·s-1. (2) The wind speed of CSCAT is 30%-70% larger than that of ASCAT-A/B/C when the wind speed is below 2 m·s-1, 0-5% smaller than ASCAT-A in the range of 2-21 m·s-1, 3%-30% larger than ASCAT-B/C in the range of 2-3 m·s-1, and 2%-10% smaller than ASCAT-B/C in the range of 4-17 m·s-1. (3) In 2021, the overall wind speed of CSCAT in China’s offshore areas is larger than that of ASCAT-A, and the wind speed of CSCAT is 0.5-1.5 m·s-1 larger than that of ASCAT-A in the East China Sea, the South China Sea, the Philippines and the waters east of it in January. The wind speed of CSCAT is 1.0-1.5 m·s-1 larger than that of ASCAT-A in the Yellow Sea and the South China Sea in July, which is consistent with the changes in the monthly mean wind speed in China’s offshore areas in 2021, showing that the cross validation of wind speed can well reveal the difference in wind speed between satellites.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

高理,孔祥宁,李玉,张秀芝,董旭光. CFOSAT与MetOp卫星散射计12.5km产品反演风速交叉验证分析[J].海洋气象学报,2024,44(4):91-100.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
文章历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-09
  • 最后修改日期:2024-10-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-03
  • 出版日期:

“海雾专题”征稿通知

关闭