湖南初夏两次暴雨过程的云微物理特征对比
作者:
作者单位:

1.气象防灾减灾湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410018 ;2.湖南省气象台,湖南 长沙 410018 ;3.洞庭湖国家气候观象台,湖南 岳阳 414000 ;4.中国气象局高影响天气(专项)重点开放实验室,湖南 长沙 410018 ;5.山东省气象防灾减灾重点实验室,山东 济南 250031 ;6.山东省气象台,山东 济南 250031 ;7.长岛国家气候观象台,山东 长岛 265800

作者简介:

第一作者:黄如琦,助理工程师,huangrq770@163.com。
通信作者:吴雪旭,工程师,wuxuexu2116@yeah.net。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3007804);湖南省气象局创新发展专项(CXFZ2026-MSXM01);湖南省气象台青年创新基金项目(QNJJ202508);长岛国家气候观象台开放基金项目(2024cdkfm02)


请扫码阅读

Comparative analysis on cloud microphysical characteristics in two rainstorm events during early summer in Hunan
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Hunan Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Changsha 410018 , China ; 2.Hunan Meteorological Observatory, Changsha 410018 , China ; 3.Dongting Lake National Climate Observatory, Yueyang 414000 , China ; 4.Key Open Laboratory of High-Impact Weather (Special), China Meteorological Administration, Changsha 410018 , China ; 5.Key Laboratory for Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Shandong, Jinan 250031 , China ; 6.Shandong Meteorological Observatory, Jinan 250031 , China ; 7.Changdao National Climate Observatory, Changdao 265800 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为深入理解不同类型暴雨的微物理特征差异,利用降水现象仪、多普勒天气雷达资料和欧洲中期天气预报中心第五代大气再分析(ERA5)资料,选取2025年6月湖南两次暴雨过程(7—9日以短时强降水为主的暴雨过程,简记为“6·7”过程;21—23日以持续性降水为主的暴雨过程,简记为“6·21”过程)进行对比分析。结果表明:(1)两次过程天气形势较为相似,均受500 hPa高空槽和中低层低涡切变线影响,但相比于“6·7”过程,“6·21”过程的影响系统更为稳定、移动缓慢,导致降水落区重叠、持续时间长、累计雨量大。(2)“6·7”过程对流发展旺盛,雷达回波质心低、降水效率高;“6·21”过程云顶较低,强回波中心位于0 ℃层以下,以层状云降水为主。(3)两次过程均为直径小于1 mm粒子对数浓度贡献最大、直径介于1~3 mm的雨滴对降水量贡献最显著;对比两次过程的平均质量加权直径(Dm)和归一化截距参数(lg Nw),短时强降水过程的lg NwDm分别为3.7~3.9 mm-1·m-3和2.0~2.3 mm,而持续性降水过程lg Nw更大(4.0~4.2 mm-1·m-3)、Dm更小(1.6~1.7 mm)。(4)雷达反射率因子-雨强(Z-R)关系的分析显示,“6·7”过程对流降水的系数较大、指数较小;“6·21”过程对流降水的系数较小、指数较大。本研究揭示了两类暴雨在云物理机制上的差异,可为湖南暴雨的雷达定量降水估测提供参考。关键词雨滴谱;微物理过程;短时强降水;暴雨过程

    Abstract:

    To better characterize the microphysical differences among different types of rainstorms, this study conducts a comparative analysis on two rainstorm events in Hunan in June 2025, using data from precipitation spectrometers and Doppler weather radars, as well as ERA5 reanalysis data. The two events include a short-duration heavy precipitation dominated rainstorm from 7 to 9 (the “6·7” event) and a persistent precipitation dominated rainstorm from 21 to 23 (the “6·21” event). The results are shown below. (1) The synoptic situations of the two events are relatively similar, both influenced by a 500-hPa trough and a vortex shear line in the middle-lower level. However, compared with the “6·7” event, the synoptic systems in the “6·21” event are more stable with slower movement, leading to overlapped heavy rainfall areas, prolonged duration and large accumulated precipitation. (2) The “6·7” event exhibits vigorous convective development, with low radar echo centroid and high precipitation efficiency. In contrast, the “6·21” event has lower cloud tops and strong echo centers are located below 0 ℃, indicating predominantly stratiform cloud precipitation. (3) In both events, raindrops with diameters less than 1 mm contribute most to the number concentration, while raindrops with diameters of 1-3 mm contribute most to the amount of precipitation. The Dm and lg Nw of the two events are compared. The lg Nw and Dm values of the short-duration heavy precipitation event are 3.7-3.9 mm-1·m-3 and 2.0-2.3 mm, respectively; the persistent precipitation event, however, displays higher lg Nw 4.0-4.2 mm-1·m-3) and lower Dm(1.6-1.7 mm). (4) The analysis of the radar reflectivity-rainfall rate (Z-R) relationship reveals that the convective precipitation in the “6·7” event is characterized by a larger coefficient and a smaller exponent, while that in the “6·21” event has a smaller coefficient and a larger exponent. This study reveals the differences in the cloud physical mechanisms between the two types of rainstorms and can provide references for radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation of rainstorms in Hunan.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

黄如琦,吴雪旭.湖南初夏两次暴雨过程的云微物理特征对比[J].海洋气象学报,2026,46(2):136-150.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
文章历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-13
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-05
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-22
  • 出版日期: